Based on member feedback, we are in the process of redesigning our Resource Library, as well as working on an improved search feature. In the meantime, if you need assistance finding a resource or would like to discuss an issue with a member of the legal team, please contact us at IAALegalTeam@investmentadviser.org.
The IAA joined other trade associations to support a CBOE BZX Exchange proposal to exempt listed closed-end funds from an annual meeting requirement so as to prevent harm to long-term retail investors that are protected by the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The IAA joins other trade associations to support a NYSE proposal to exempt listed closed-end funds from an annual meeting requirement so as to prevent harm to long-term retail investors that are protected by the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The IAA supported the objective of the proposal to make the applications process more efficient. The IAA also supported comments made by the Investment Company Institute regarding the expedited review process, transparency on the timeframe for staff action, and concerns on publication of comments and responses.
The IAA had significant concerns regarding the disruptive impact that the proposed limit on redemptions would have on fund management. The IAA also argued that private funds and foreign funds should be permitted to rely on the proposed rule.
The IAA urged the SEC to reconsider the portfolio investment classification requirements of the fund liquidity rule, consistent with recommendations of a report by the Department of the Treasury.
The IAA generally supported the proposal but recommended more flexibility regarding the reporting requirements, making the definition of “readily available market quotation” reflect current valuation practices, and flexibility for a fund board to assign the fair value determination to the fund’s primary adviser or sub-adviser.
The IAA generally supported the proposed derivatives rule, with certain modifications to reduce unnecessary burdens on advisers. The IAA strongly opposed the proposed sales practice rule for investment advisers related to retail investor transactions in leveraged/inverse investment vehicles because it is both duplicative of and inconsistent with the principles-based approach to fiduciary duty.
You are now leaving Investment Adviser Association
The IAA provides links to web sites of other organizations in order to provide visitors with certain information. A link does not constitute an endorsement of content, viewpoint, policies, products or services of that web site. Once you link to another web site not maintained by the IAA, you are subject to the terms and conditions of that web site, including but not limited to its privacy policy.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.